據(jù)歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）消息，2024年11月19日，歐盟食品安全局就活性物質(zhì)赤霉素(GA4/GA7)的農(nóng)藥風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估發(fā)布同行評審?！ ?br> 經(jīng)過評估，將赤霉素(GA4/GA7)作為植物生長調(diào)節(jié)劑用在蘋果和梨的基礎(chǔ)上，歐盟食品安全局提出了適用于監(jiān)管風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估的可靠端點(diǎn)，列出了監(jiān)管框架要求的缺失信息，發(fā)現(xiàn)問題時(shí)會進(jìn)行報(bào)告。部分原文報(bào)道如下：
The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Slovenia and co-rapporteur Member State Slovakia for the pesticide active substance gibberellins (GA4/GA7) and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of gibberellins (GA4/GA7) as a plant growth regulator on apple and pear (field use). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported when identified.
The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Slovenia and co-rapporteur Member State Slovakia for the pesticide active substance gibberellins (GA4/GA7) and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of gibberellins (GA4/GA7) as a plant growth regulator on apple and pear (field use). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported when identified.
