2023年10月24日，歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）發(fā)布消息，歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）發(fā)布關(guān)于植物乳桿菌（Lactiplantibacillus plantarum）LMG P-21295作為所有動(dòng)物飼料添加劑的授權(quán)更新申請(qǐng)的評(píng)估。
經(jīng)過(guò)評(píng)估，專(zhuān)家小組得出結(jié)論，該添加劑在授權(quán)使用條件下對(duì)所有動(dòng)物物種、消費(fèi)者和環(huán)境都是安全的。在授權(quán)更新的情況下，無(wú)需評(píng)估添加劑的功效。部分原文報(bào)道如下：
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LMG P-21295, a technological additive to improve ensiling of fresh material for all animal species. The applicant has provided evidence that the additive currently on the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. There is no new evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel concludes that the additive remains safe for all animal species, consumers and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. The Panel is not in the position to conclude on the skin and eye irritation potential of the additive. No conclusions can be drawn on the potential of the additive to cause skin sensitisation, but it is considered to be a respiratory sensitiser. There is no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
經(jīng)過(guò)評(píng)估，專(zhuān)家小組得出結(jié)論，該添加劑在授權(quán)使用條件下對(duì)所有動(dòng)物物種、消費(fèi)者和環(huán)境都是安全的。在授權(quán)更新的情況下，無(wú)需評(píng)估添加劑的功效。部分原文報(bào)道如下：
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LMG P-21295, a technological additive to improve ensiling of fresh material for all animal species. The applicant has provided evidence that the additive currently on the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. There is no new evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel concludes that the additive remains safe for all animal species, consumers and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. The Panel is not in the position to conclude on the skin and eye irritation potential of the additive. No conclusions can be drawn on the potential of the additive to cause skin sensitisation, but it is considered to be a respiratory sensitiser. There is no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
